Pattern #84
Pattern Card
Click to enlarge or download Pattern Card.
Buy or Download
To buy or download the complete Wise Democracy Card Deck use the Buy & Download button.
Comments
We invite your participation in evolving this pattern language with us. Use the comment section at the bottom of this page to comment on its contents or to share related ideas and resources.
Tackling Cognitive Limitations
Tackling Cognitive Limitations
Credits: Background: alphaspirit – Shutterstock / izustun – iStock
Pattern Heart
We didn’t evolve to individually comprehend the world we now live in. Neurological limits, psychological biases, situational complexity, all demand we transcend cognitive shortcomings. So use psychological insights, systems thinking, science, dialogue, artificial and multiple intelligences, and any other means to collectively embrace fuller realities than we can grasp individually.
Tackling Cognitive Limitations – going Deeper …
This is an edited version of the video on this page.
My introduction to this concept came when I read a book about a decade and a half ago called NEW WORLD NEW MIND by Robert Ornstein and Paul Ehrlich. In that book they talk about our cognitive systems – our senses and our brains – the ways we come to know things, to learn about things, to decide things, to solve problems, to respond appropriately to the challenges that we meet.
At an individual level our cognitive systems are basically the same as they were 10,000 years ago. But as societies we have created new environments, challenges and opportunities never before seen. The whole human world we live in – and even much of the natural world – is not remotely what it was back in the ancient empires and in our hunter gatherer days. So there is this big mismatch between our environment and the ways we understand and respond to our environment. That’s largely what this “Cognitive Limitations” pattern is all about.
If we want to take into account what needs to be taken into account for long-term broad benefit – our definition of wise – then we need to be able to understand and be mindful of our own cognitive limitations, as well as those of the people around us, and of the groups who are making decisions or shaping the contexts in which we live, within which our decisions are made, within which we tell ourselves stories about what’s going on, or within which we are trying to respond individually and collectively.
The people and the cultures and the processes that we use for all those things are shaped by certain limitations. If we’re not aware of those limitations we will miss important factors. One of the resources I offer with this pattern is the book I just mentioned which is truly profound. The solution it focuses on, if I remember correctly, is education about systems thinking because systems thinking is a way to get beyond the limits of our ancient ways of seeing and thinking.
This is important because one of the biggest problems with our inherited individual cognitive capacity is that we instinctively respond to situations that are visible, immediate, urgent, and obviously tied to our survival. Unfortunately, nowadays the really important challenges we need to respond to involve systemic complexity. They are usually more subtle – even invisible – and longterm or distant.
We can’t easily see – or see through – systemic complexity. We don’t know that when we buy certain kinds of chocolate, we are participating in the enslavement of children in Africa. We don’t know necessarily that when we’re driving our cars or eating our meat we are affecting the future of our grandchildren in terms of climate change. We may have financial troubles but we don’t know that the difference between the money we have and the money that other people have – the vast inequality in wealth – is shaping what’s happening in the society through power dynamics that distort economics, politics, governance and everything else.
Video Introduction (8 min)
Examples and Resources
- New World New Mind
- Cognitive Bias – Wikipedia Link
- List of Cognitive Biases – Wikipedia Link
- Macroscopes
- AI – The Era of Augmented Cognition
- Problems with truth and reality
- On Humility
- Sacred Instructions
- Permaculture Pattern Language pp. 53-56, 81-89, 98-100
- Animation: the 10 biggest cities in the world, 1500-2018 [OC]
- Working with Racial Bias
- When different sense-making perspectives meet
- The Ladder of Inference
- Finding our way together – through innovations in shared understanding
Below is an excerpt from an article about the placebo effect that suggests that confirmation bias is intimately linked with the expectation mechanics of how we perceive things. Source: https://nautil.us/sugar-pill-nation-294292/?CALIBER-2023_04_16=&sponsored=0&position=5&scheduled_corpus_item_id=88e70c8d-b19d-4249-bdc2-e1e7ee7d86c3
According to one of the most prolific researchers in the field of placebos, Harvard professor of medicine Ted Kaptchuk, the placebo effect may be best explained by a popular theory of consciousness called “predictive processing,” or the “Bayesian brain.”
According to this way of thinking, the brain doesn’t just take in sensory signals from the body and the outside world and process them directly. Instead minute-to-minute perception consists of a series of best guesses, or predictions about the world, calibrated via a complex computation of values from sensory inputs, past experiences and subtle contextual cues. These predictions are constantly updated as new information comes in, and they can be heavily influenced by expectations and associations. Our bodies may then begin to respond as if what we have predicted were already true.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6319577/ provides further fascinating clarification for the “Bayesian brain” theory referenced below.
Here’s a great quote to clarify the role of science in extending our limited senses into realms we weren’t evolved to perceive and understand (as described in the New World New Mind book in the Examples and Resources above). To its insights I would add that this is why we should be ESPECIALLY alert to the dynamics that (a) degrade the quality of scientific practice (e.g., the role of ego and confirmation bias in peer review activities) and (b) break the link between scientific knowledge and decision-making (both collective and individual) as we see happening in the anti-science variants of populism. But here’s the great quote:
“Science is the best method we’ve ever devised to answer questions we cannot answer with casual observations; it extends our observations and senses to the realms of the unseeable, unhearable and untouchable; to see beyond the limits of our eyes, and hear beyond the limits of our ears. It provides methods to defend us from our native biases, to account for variables we have not even considered, and to measure the differences between causation and fluke.”
— Dr David L. Katz https://heated.medium.com/we-know-more-about-food-than-ever-before-d9266b0aabce
I cannot help but think that thinking is our biggest limitation on its own. For many people, it seems that thinking is equivalent to knowing and knowing allows a sense of complacency. Or, that’s how schooling seems to work (at least in Ireland today).
Confusing thinking with knowing would seem to create limits to…well, thinking more. And thinking more (or outside, or deeply) should be a global goal within any wise democracy.
One way I have found to keep my thinking open was to take some pride in my ignorance. That’s correct. I take pride in my ignorance. I’m not afraid or hesitant to say something like, ‘I don’t know, let’s find out together…’
There was a book published a few years ago with the lovely titled, ‘Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance’ (edited by Robert Proctor). Of course, it would seem that more and more ignorance is promoted these days…I never use the term ‘fake news’, I just say bulls**t and that covers it for me.
I like Tom’s comment about ‘recognising our limitations (which…can make us humble…)’ I would like to arrive at humility one of these…years!
brian
This pattern language is filled with patterns that deal with not-knowing – from Full Spectrum Information to Wise Use of Uncertainty, Capacitance, Dancing among Clarity, Inquiry, Mystery…., Prudent Progress and Creative Experimentation, among others….. It seems that being mindful of what we don’t know and not rushing to conclusions is a major part of wisdom, eh?
I appreciate the importance of this pattern at many levels. The comment discussion and some of the themes prompt me to share this episode of You Are Not So Smart podcast about “the dress”.
https://youarenotsosmart.com/2019/06/06/yanss-155-what-we-can-learn-about-why-we-dangerously-disagree-on-the-truth-from-the-dress-yanny-and-bloie-presented-live-in-new-york-at-the-bell-house/
I am particularly drawn to this pattern from a place of stewardship; stewardship of collective sense making and decision making.
I see a value in having some basics steps or sequencing of systemic awareness.
Has anything such been compiled in the context of WD?
This is part of the _no mind left behind_ program for learners of all ages and abilities.
Appreciate you sharing this podcast….very relevant and fascinating discussion (in particular the pieces on cognitive empathy, and how the way our brains take in and interpret information relates to & seeks to reinforce our identities). I found it helpful, thank you.
What a trip that You Are Not So Smart podcast is, Keala!! Thank you so much. On way too little sleep I sat down to see if I could get the gist of it in 5 or 10 minutes and ended up watching the whole hour and forty minutes. Its reflections on several dimensions of “the post-truth era” reminded me of two blog posts I wrote on that subject – The fall and rise of truth, trust and society’s capacity for wisdom and Reality, truth and consequences. Reality is such a hot topic now, which in my youth was a fringe philosophical inquiry (although in my college drug days I had a button that said “Reality is a crutch”).
There’s another blog post that directly addresses your interest in “stewardship of collective sense making and decision making”: Sense-making – together and apart.
You wonder if anyone has compiled some basics steps or sequencing of systemic awareness in the context of wise democracy. I don’t think so. But it sounds interesting, even though I’m not sure what it would be. if you send me a draft of what such a list might include (in your view), I’ll consider contributing thoughts to it.
Jenny, I can certainly relate to this feeling. This class is poking at my cognition and shining light on my own limitations of experience, education, and awareness. While not always comfortable, this is a good thing and in this class, it feels challenging, but very “safe.” I find myself always wanting to respond with my own experiences, which is understandable, but also limiting. I think humility, in other words, being humble enough to change my stance, to explore the unknown, to accept my limitations and those of others, is useful and seminal to learning about pattern language and its role in a wise democracy.
I chose to take a closer look at this pattern because it feels quite alive for me as I work to understand this pattern language more broadly! Trying to deepen my understanding is bringing stark awareness to my own personal cognitive limitations even just to take the information in (especially the parts that feel most foreign), and grasp its meaning and interconnectivity on what feels like should be a basic level. The description in the video/text about how we haven’t evolved or been trained to be able to understand complexity and see things more on a systemic level was helpful in understanding why this feels so frustrating.
Realizing our individual inability to engage well, cognitively and actively, with complexity, scale, distance (in time and space), etc., was the first stimulus for creating this pattern. As I explored for Examples and Resources to post on this page, I discovered a vast field of cognitive distortions that have been identified by psychologists – for example, a well-known one is “confirmation bias”, but there are many dozens more. This pattern became even more powerful a factor in my eyes, given our need to “take into account what needs to be taken into account for long-term broad benefit”. How can we do that when we can’t perceive or understand what’s in and around us? “Tackling” such limitations is a gigantic task, probably mostly do-able just in pieces in particular circumstances. Occasionally, with things like Systems Thinking, we can tackle whole clusters of our limitations with one approach. But regardless of how we approach it, we need to somehow rise to the challenge, do our best, accept correction from Reality, and recognize our limitations (which at least can make us humble instead of arrogant, which is a great wisdomy gift!).