Pattern #61
Pattern Card
Click to enlarge or download Pattern Card.
Buy or Download
To buy or download the complete Wise Democracy Card Deck use the Buy & Download button.
Comments
We invite your participation in evolving this pattern language with us. Use the comment section at the bottom of this page to comment on its contents or to share related ideas and resources.
Partnership Culture
Partnership Culture
The search for long-term broad benefit requires the shared openness and energy of all participants. Competition is part of it but cooperation and mutual aid are the dominant themes. So realize the power of conscious collegiality. Nurture awareness that treats everyone, everything, and every situation as a potential partner.
Some related patterns: 13 Commons and Commoning 20 Cooperative Ownership as Stewardship 28 Equity 58 Nurturing Social Capital
79 Spaces for Dialogue and Collaboration 88 Using Diversity and Disturbance Creatively 92 Whole System in the Conversation
Partnership Culture – going Deeper …
This is an edited version of the video on this page.
Long-term broad benefit is not going to be a top-down operation. It is not going to involve one group pulling it all off. If we want to generate long-term broad benefits over and over again, there needs to be a mixture of shared forward energy and orientation – with co-creative and other resources brought together – and there needs to not be a lot of unnecessary resistance, cross-purposes and friction in the system.
This requires a society that is grounded in working together. There are ways in which competition can be part of that. The Olympics is an interesting example of competition supporting collaboration. All the countries are working together to evoke the best performances of their prized athletes. One of the theories of the free market is that competition feeds innovation, efficiency and all the rest. This is good as long as we understand that the fundamental thing we need at this stage of humanity’s development is working together, helping each other out.
That goes not just for our relationships with each other but our relationships with the natural world. Are we working as partners with nature? Do we become an integral part of nature? For example, we have this activity called “recycling”. But nature has been recycling things for ages: there is no waste in nature. When one part of nature gives off something, another part picks it up and uses it. So when we do our “recycling” of various products we’ve created, we are joining and partnering with this larger cyclic activity of nature and its dynamics.
Permaculture principles are designed to help us partner with nature. It’s like: How can we become part of a designed ecosystem where every part is both contributing and benefiting, including us. This is instead of thinking, “This is a dead land that we are going to pour fertilizer on it and extract plant material from it as if we are mining it.” In permaculture there is a sense of not dominating or fighting against nature but working with it at every level and every step of the way.
How can we deal with situations this way? If we have a conflict, for example, we can use that conflict creatively if we work together on it. We can resolve it and, in the process, deepen our relationship, deepen our understanding of each other. There’s a saying that “If life gives you lemons, make lemonade!” The idea behind that is that there are lessons and capacities, potential gifts, etc., buried in situations. We can be humbled by crises, and we can be gotten out of our houses. A book called Paradise Built in Hell describes how in earthquakes and other local disasters people come out of their houses and help each other and provide spontaneous services to their community. This is a natural response that happens almost all the time in such situations.
Video Introduction (14 min)
Examples and Resources
- The Partnership Way from Riane Eisler and David Loye Link
- Open Space Link
- Future Search Link
- Permaculture Link-Wikipedia
- Coalition-building Link-Wikipedia
- Anarchism Link-Wikipedia
- Gift economy Link-Wikipedia
- Raising Children for Interdependence Link-WaPo
- Sharing economy Link-Wikipedia
- Networking software/sites networking software sites
Links-Shareable-Free-apps-to-swap-share-and-sell-your-extra-stuff
Link-Shareable-Platforms-to-start-your-own-sharing-service
Link-Ebizmba - Circle Forward’s Governance Networks vision – Link
- Circle Forward’s Consent approach – Link
- Open Dialogue (participatory therapy) – site Link, video Link
- Story Bridge Link
- Community Bridge Link
The Partnership Way is a book by Riane Eisler which promotes partnering between the values originally viewed as masculine with those typically viewed as feminine (which in many cultures are considered less valuable). The aim is to overcome these patriarchal belief systems and dynamics to promote a spirit of partnership – especially between men and women – in all spheres of society.
Permaculture is a form of partnering with nature. Some of the permaculture principles are now being applied by permaculture practitioners – of which there are thousands – to community and society. They are asking, “How do we design a mutually beneficial community of people using some of the understandings we have from designing mutually beneficial permaculture gardens?” Permaculture sees everything as a potential resource for the life and productivity of a living system.
This and the related Patterns are of highest relevance for my work at this time. Cultivating the capacity and context for partnership and infinite game dynamics is central to emergence and thriving of regenerative culture.
Thank you, whoever you are. I’d love it you’d give us a name to know you by.
Yes of course, I will claim my comment – i thought i had selected the auto fill option of saving for future comments. Designing .. perceiving for Omni-Win
Also another thought occured to me which may not be entirely correct (happy for anyone to challenge) Representative democracy and this first wave of participatory democracy we are now seeing is concerned with getting to outcomes, wise democracy prioritises relationships and right relationship to natural dynamics. That by itself produces harmonious outcomes,
Thanks Andy. I think I hear you saying that too many current democratic innovations advocate approaches that go for outcomes that may seem better from the majoritarian win/lose (“zero-sum”) perspective, but that may damage relationships (mostly, but not only, with the “losers”) thereby losing or wasting (or having to continue to fight against) understandings and energies that the “losers” brought to the table. And I think I hear you saying that the wise democracy approach seeks to embrace ever greater scope and diversity of players, information, relationship, possibilities, energies, etc., to get a more comprehensive picture of – and buy-in for – what’s really needed. AND when the spirit of partnership prevails throughout, the outcomes are likely to be smoother and wiser, with less missed and less friction. Something like that?
I see this ‘Partnership Culture’ as one important element that I intuit as distinguishing the Wise Democracy vision from the current wave of Participatory or Deliberative Democracy initiatives. Here’s my attempt at fleshing that out:
In most processes today such as the Citizens Assemblies taking place in the UK or elsewhere the focus seems to be on democratically legitimate outcomes produced by broadly representative mini publics, finding breakthroughs on contentious issues and creating a mandate that representatives can use to create policy. The aspect of bringing people with diverse perspectives into collaboration seems to be secondary. As I see it the Wise Democracy vision is saying we’ve reached a point in our evolution in which we have no choice but to learn to work together and enter into partnership with other human beings and with nature in order to at least begin to work effectively with the crises we face. We have to learn to work with the disturbances because the alternative of trying to overpower them creates feedback loops that will destroy us. So in Wise Democracy developing this Partnership culture is more of a priority than fairness and democratic legitimacy because it’s what’s needed to secure our long term future.
Excellent insight, Andy. The word “culture” is used here quite intentionally. I want to promote a sense that healthy life and healthy living systems – both society’s and nature’s – are overwhelmingly about co-creative activity, cooperation, partnership, etc., and that we should embed that fact and perspective in all our relationships, projects, thinking, institutions, etc. This includes but goes way beyond explicit political activities. Even HEALTHY competition (see the “Healthy Competition/Cooperation Dynamics” pattern https://www.wd-pl.com/43-healthy-competition-cooperation-dynamics-v2/) can be seen to be a collaboration between the competitors to improve their performance or product and keep them answerable. Such dynamics are obviously a major part of “evoking and engaging the wisdom and resourcefulness of the whole on behalf of the whole” (wise democracy’s “prime directive”)).
Incidentally, now that I have read the amazing book “Braiding Sweetgrass” about indigenous consciousness and science, I would now call this pattern “Partnership Culture and Reciprocity”, but that’s for version 3.0!