Pattern #50
Pattern Card
Click to enlarge or download Pattern Card.
Buy or Download
To buy or download the complete Wise Democracy Card Deck use the Buy & Download button.
Comments
We invite your participation in evolving this pattern language with us. Use the comment section at the bottom of this page to comment on its contents or to share related ideas and resources.
Life-Enhancing Enoughness
Credit: Iakov Filimonov – Shutterstock
Pattern Heart
Realizing long-term broad benefits involves realizing an abundance of life-serving qualities and conditions in both the present and the future. So counter both unnecessary scarcity and tendencies towards greed, extremism and unconstrained appetite by promoting the ample sufficiency of prudence, simplicity, companionship, health, beauty, gratitude, generosity, equity, spirit and creativity.
Some related patterns: 2 Appreciative Thinking 13 Commons and Commoning 32 Fair Sharing of Costs and Benefits 61 Partnership Culture 72 Regenerativity 84 Tackling Cognitive Limitations 86 Universal Intelligence
Life-Enhancing Enoughness – going deeper …
This is an edited version of the video on this page.
As part of generating the long-term broad benefits which constitute the essence of public wisdom – the wisdom of a whole society engaged in wise democratic self-governance – we need to think in terms of the seventh generation after us. We have inherited this profound seventh generation consideration from American indigenous cultures. We need to ask: What is the seventh generation after us going to have to work with? What will their culture be like? How is their culture going to look at how to satisfy their own needs? How will they look at how we are going about satisfying ours?
This rapidly moves into questions of sustainability. Within the physical constraints of a limited world, how should we relate to physical resources in order to leave enough for the future? And in the present, how do we create our society, our economies, our politics to have enough for all the people who are here now and for the other life forms we share this planet with?
We need to realize there are constraints to our consumption, obviously, because there are physical limits. However, remarkably, there is also tremendous potential abundance hidden in those constraints. There are many surveys of how happy people are with different levels of wealth and consumption. It turns out, as expected, that people who are seriously deprived – and suffering because of it – are not happy. But it also turns out that people who have lots of things tend to be attached to those things and they are also not happy. People in the middle who have enough to survive and feel more or less comfortable, yet have challenges on the physical level, find happiness in nonphysical, non-consumptive realities. They gain happiness through relationships, through beauty, through their connection to nature, through spirit, and through creativity, both individually and collectively.
Video Introduction (10 min)
Examples and Resources
- Quality of life indicators Link
- The Simple Living movement Link-Wikipedia
- Gift Economy Link-Wikipedia
- Stretch: Unlock the Power of Less – and achieve more than you ever imagined
Link-Book
Link-Article - The New Materialism Link
- The Story of Stuff Link
- Permaculture Pattern Language (book) pp. 15-26, 98-100
- Easterlin Paradox Link-Wikipedia
- Paradox of Affluence Link
- Radical Gratitude Link
- Catalytic Thinking Practices Link
- The Radical Implications of Staying within Capacity Link
- Decluttering Link
There are a bunch of alternative indicators to Gross Domestic Product. GDP is basically how much money is spent in the economy. And it has a lot to do with consumption. So we want to move away from that into what really makes life worth living. Let’s measure that and keep that improving. And that will naturally gravitate towards an abundance of life-enhancing enoughness. Among the approaches to quality of life indicators are The Genuine Progress Indicator and Gross National Happiness.
The Simple Living movement and the gift economy involve an attitude of let us share more, let us give each other more, let us find our life value and our life meaning in supporting rich relationships with a sense of all of us being in this together – and it ends up being very potent.
Enoughness; what a great work and concept. Like the joy that leaving behind the striving for perfection can bring when one embraces “good enough for now”, it is fun to contemplate the massive release of energy and resources possible in a switch to “life enhancing enoughness”!
Your “massive release of energy and resources” comment actually articulates the living link between enoughness and abundance really well, Kathy!!
As I read this card and the comments to it, I wonder, “Can a society embrace or manifest “enoughness,” if the individuals in that society do not do it on an individual level? Would societal “enoughness” be the composite result of all or most individual “enoughness?” As I write that question, it occurs to me that no, we could all have individual “enoughness,” but for this to be a characteristic of the society or group we belong to, it would have to be intentionally incorporated into the societal structures, goals, etc., as Tom explains above. What a complicated concept! As mentioned previously, each individual has their own concept or definition of “enoughness,” which might make consensus about societal “enoughness” more challenging to achieve. Who decides how much is enough? How is the decision made? I know that I struggle with “enoughness” in my personal life as I have a distorted perception of it based in childhood experience. It is a life-long battle grounded in fear of scarcity.
The Worldwatch Institute’s Alan Durning wrote a book entitled How Much is Enough? It doesn’t answer the question (as you note, Laurie, answers tend to be relative to this or that context or consideration) but it does model the kind of inquiry the question challenges us to do for ourselves, our communities, our contexts. And I think there’s a big feedback loop between individuals and groups and societies (and their cultures and systems). The “enoughness” dynamics and narratives in any of them can influence the “enoughness” dynamics in the others, for better or worse.
Luckily, all this doesn’t have to be a battle. There is a LOT of evidence that “too much” (of so many things) actually makes most of us unhappy while “too little” does the same. The trick is to focus on quality of life – the “life-enhancing” part – and to seriously sense into what REALLY makes us happy, while remaining mindful of the impacts of our consumerist choices on other people, life forms, systems, etc. It is actually pretty amazing how happy one can be with very little in the way of money and stuff, especially in the context of a community that seeks to support exactly that kind of happiness in, with, and for each other.
It strikes me that ‘life enhancing enough-ness’ is a much harder quality to manifest collectively (in a group) than individually. We each have our internal or private economies operating, and may consider from time to time how scarcity and abundance balance each other. ‘I was so fortunate yesterday, so I can accept with grace the tough time I’m having today’. How can we foster this important quality in our group life? Perhaps by consciously/actively affirming this as an element in our group culture. Or – in a practical sense – by weaving into the group agenda regular discussions that are abundance-focused.
I suspect that your reflection is very valid, James, especially in our consumerist culture which pulls us in exactly the opposite direction. In that context, we appropriately see our group life as a source of potential support in resisting the Siren call of consumerism. But keep in mind that not all cultures have been or are consumerist – the Amish and many traditional indigenous cultures being notable examples. And the word “collective” applies to communities, societies, cultures and civilizations as well as to groups (and networks and organizations, etc.). So, while much in this pattern language can be applied to individual and group life, its primary application – as suggested by its “wise democracy” framing – is to the design of communities, societies, cultures and civilizations. And a civilization that aspired to embody collective wisdom and to practice generating it would need to find ways to DESIGN this pattern into its narratives, processes, structures, etc., with validations, supports, measurements, norms, rituals, etc., that made “life-enhancing enoughness” the expected texture of life rather than a struggling exception to the dominant waste and unhappiness. Check out the Manfred Max-Neef links in the Examples and Resources section of the Grounding in Fundamental Needs pattern.
This pattern draws me today, as I particularly reflect on the need for rest cycles in context for regenerativity, it is also important in contradicting white supremacy culture across multiple dimensions. I particularly appreciate the intent of “life-enhancing” as an important attribute to notice about processes and people. Great shared language and understanding to cultivate for embodied living systems.