Pattern #43
Pattern Card
Click to enlarge or download Pattern Card.
Buy or Download
To buy or download the complete Wise Democracy Card Deck use the Buy & Download button.
Comments
We invite your participation in evolving this pattern language with us. Use the comment section at the bottom of this page to comment on its contents or to share related ideas and resources.
Healthy Competition / Cooperation Dynamics
Healthy Competition / Cooperation Dynamics
Credit: wavebreakmedia – Shutterstock
Pattern Heart
Cooperative dynamics generate power-with that channels collective energies towards shared accomplishment. But cooperative dynamics can also undermine diversity and initiative. Competitive dynamics can promote quality improvement and choice — but they can also promote domination and harm. So understand and wisely weave together the healthy dynamics of both.
Healthy Competition / Cooperation Dynamics – going deeper …
This is an edited version of the video on this page.
This pattern has a great picture of these kids pulling in tug-of-war against each other. So there’s cooperation on each side and competition between the teams. That’s really interesting because this is an evolutionary dynamic which we see a lot of in the corporate world and in politics – the sense of people cooperating in teams in order to win a competition against other teams. The cooperation is embedded in a competitive frame of reference.
I read a really interesting book called “Nonzero“ on evolution, which looks at the civilizational predicament we are in right now. In the history of evolution and in the history of the universe and the history of life you see more and more this pattern of entities combining together into larger entities that can do things the smaller entities couldn’t. And that’s been building up since subatomic particles all the way up to people in global economic systems. At all levels, we see this phenomenon of functional complexity being built out of smaller parts which are themselves built out of smaller parts and smaller parts and smaller parts… it goes on virtually forever.
That dynamic is largely run by this logic: If we cooperate we can better compete for resources to further our survival in the larger evolutionary world. But the author of “Nonzero” is saying that our most relevant context has today changed from local to global: we can no longer afford to focus on winning by competing. We need to have cooperation become the context within which competition happens, rather than the other way around.
We need to globally build cooperative systems within which various forms of competition can safely happen. At the scale of the planet, the downsides of poorly managed competition can be terminal for human existence.
It is not that competition is bad. Competition is still great. Consider the Olympics. We think of Olympics as a great enterprise undertaken by all of humanity. All these teams and individuals are competing intensively with each other and they have gone through intensive training and their whole spirit is to compete to win. But the whole operation, the whole activity itself is symbolic of multinational global cooperation. We maintain that practice of every four years doing another exercise in competition as something that we do together in good sportsmanship. What is called “good sportsmanship” is largely about making sure your competitive spirit is contained within the assumptions and spirit of cooperation.
You can see that even in nature. There is lots of cooperation in nature. There’s major research done on the amount of cooperation, of synergies, of mutual dependencies in nature – even in the predator-prey relationship, which is the ultimate sort of competition, in the sense that I’m going to kill you to eat you. It is like I will dominate you and get rid of you.
But predator-prey relationships actually are cooperative when seen in the larger picture. If foxes eat too many rabbits, the rabbit population crashes and the foxes starve. And if the rabbits become too numerous and quick and hard to catch, the foxes starve and the rabbits multiply and eat up all their food sources so there’s nothing left to eat and they starve. The populations of rabbits and foxes fluctuate with these dynamics, ensuring that there’s a balanced dance or feedback loop between the numbers and capacities of foxes and rabbits, generating healthy populations of both.
We need to attend to the extent to which we’ve managed to step out of that dynamic. We are like the rabbits in the sense that we are voraciously and unsustainably consuming everything we need. But we are now also the dominant predator on the planet. It’s mostly just microbes that prey on us, and we’re constantly “winning the war” on disease. But as the dominant predator who is consuming our environment, our niche, we are ironically in danger. That destabilizing dynamic will destroy us as we become more and more successful at doing this thing that we are already really good at. We will wipe ourselves out.
So this requires rethinking what’s going on. We should focus our competition on those things which will help us all survive. Like who can create the most powerful solar cell – that’s a good competition.
Video Introduction (9 min)
Examples and Resources
- Sociology Guide – Competition – Cooperation
- Nonzero: The logic of human destiny
- Cooperation vs. Competition: Not an Either/Or Proposition
- Is competition healthy in schools? The pros and cons
- Coopetition: Wikipedia Link
- Coopetition: Cooperating with Competitors for Best Results
- How Does Intra-Governmental Competition Among City Agencies Influence Inter-Organizational Collaboration in Sustainability Initiatives?
- Permaculture Pattern Language pp. 39-42
- On Humility
“predator-prey relationships actually are cooperative when seen in the larger picture. If foxes eat too many rabbits, the rabbit population crashes and the foxes starve. And if the rabbits become too numerous and quick and hard to catch, the foxes starve and the rabbits multiply and eat up all their food sources so there’s nothing left to eat and they starve. The populations of rabbits and foxes fluctuate with these dynamics, ensuring that there’s a balanced dance or feedback loop between the numbers and capacities of foxes and rabbits, generating healthy populations of both.
We need to attend to the extent to which we’ve managed to step out of that dynamic. We are like the rabbits in the sense that we are voraciously and unsustainably consuming everything we need. But we are now also the dominant predator on the planet”
Begs the question, will we be able to see/act in cooperation with the larger picture, honoring our interdependent reality with all of life on this planet, or will we have to experience a feedback loop? I see the connection to Joanna Macy’s Council of All Beings completely.
Makes me wonder, how might we introduce this into our wise governance processes? Maybe there needs to be another pattern that is more specifically names that life is interconnected? It might recommend that councils consider the voices from the impacted aspects of the living ecology in the decision-making process. They could hold a chair open for them in the room, or bring in citizens who are asked to speak from the perspective of or on behalf of the ecology…
Right on, Rahmin! The Council of All Beings definitely offers inspiration. Having experts (e.g., ecologists, complexity scientists) testify is one approach, and having indigenous people centrally involved is another. In Starhawk’s novel The Fifth Sacred Thing she envisions masked spokespeople from the four directions standing at their points around the community council to represent key perspectives of nature. I’ve contemplated adding Reciprocity to the pattern language: I’m currently seeing it as an extension of Partnership Culture. And of course the Nature First pattern could be used to delve into this. It is indeed an important challenge to embrace….
Competition is a killer. Even in civil society, where not-for-profit organisations have a deep sense that their visions can only be achieved through collaboration. There are strong barriers to competition – the drive for funds, recognition, status and differentiation. We risk failing together. I yearn for the sense of healthy competition conjured by the image of the kids’ tug of war… their determination and sense of fun.