Pattern #19
Pattern Card
Click to enlarge or download Pattern Card.
Buy or Download
To buy or download the complete Wise Democracy Card Deck use the Buy & Download button.
Comments
We invite your participation in evolving this pattern language with us. Use the comment section at the bottom of this page to comment on its contents or to share related ideas and resources.
Context Awareness
Credit: VVO – Shutterstock
Pattern Heart
Contexts shape what happens. The same actions in different contexts create different outcomes and have different meanings. Environments, mindsets, values, expectations, situational dynamics, power relations, systemic forces, needs, culture… all these matter. So pay attention to context in whatever is explored, whatever is set up and whatever is done.
Some related patterns: 13 Commons and Commoning 29 Expanding Situational Curiosity 36 Full Spectrum Information 63 Power of Listening 74 Rich Feedback Dynamics 80 Story 82 Systems Thinking
Context Awareness – going deeper …
This is an edited version of the video on this page.
Context is often not acknowledged as important. Our attention goes to the actors or entities in the scene and the actions happening between them. We don’t pay much attention necessarily to the background.
For one of the most obvious examples of context shaping what happens, consider a person who is doing a performance that has no audience – or if they have an audience, whether that audience is being supportive or antagonistic. In every case, their performance will be different.
Context awareness is particularly important because the systems we live in are contexts for everything that is going on, everything we’re doing, everything we are thinking, everything we believe and think is real.
How we’ve grown up in this environment and the stories that we tell ourselves, how everybody else around us is thinking and responding, all this is shaping us in very powerful ways. Context is almost like a form of leadership.
The same actions in different contexts create different outcomes and have different meanings. You can dress in a business suit and go into an office and nobody notices. If you dress in a business suit and go to a hippy rock concert you are going to really stand out and people are going to think you are strange.
There are cultures where it’s considered natural for people to stand very close when talking with each other, whereas in other cultures they try to maintain some distance. There’s a book I read once that talked about diplomatic meetings where the diplomats have their relaxing cocktail hour talking to each other and they are moving around the room because person A is backing away to get person B further away and person B is moving forward to get closer to Person A. This strange cultural difference is dictating the motions of the people in the room without them even being aware of how and why it’s happening.
Video Introduction (16 min)
Examples and Resources
- Listening projects Link
- Power field analysis Link
- Concerns Link-1 Link-2 and needs
- Community Resource and Problem Mapping Link-1 Link-2
- Intercultural Training Link
- Family systems therapy Link
- Ecology Link
- Ecosociology Link
- History Link
- Paradigm studies Link
- Anthropology Link
- Demographic analysis Link
- Interviews with stakeholders or adversaries in a conflict Link
- The Role of Contextuality in the Integration of Worldviews Link
- Constellations work – Link Link (video)
- Social Presence Theater – Link (videos)
- Warm Data Lab – Link
Listening projects and all activities that involve listening – Among the methods and approaches for context awareness, listening stands out as vital. You need to listen in order to get whatever’s going on. If it’s a human situation and sometimes even a nonhuman situation, you need to listen, ask questions, see what people say and feel what the energy is. There are formal organized listening projects about which I have written descriptions on the co-intelligence.org website.
There are ways of analyzing power dynamics in a situation. You want to understand the “power field”, which is like a magnetic field shaping what’s going on. Who are the players? What sorts of power are they bringing into the situation? That is another tool that raises our context awareness.
I like this from Tom above: “…a REMINDER that we need to attend to context (as an active factor in any situation)….” I’ve found in interpersonal mediation that just setting or discovering a (very) few agreed-upon ways of interacting with each other in the mediation setting can be very powerful in how the content of the session is addressed. In my mind (and aloud if it’s appropriate), I’ve always thought of this as “context setting.” And I third the note that in being aware of context “there is infinite space to learn and to become every more humble.” (!)
Also, the card resource above on Context and Worldview, ends its abstract with: “More specifically, we propose a quantum paradigmatic shift so as to conceive of reality as consisting of many layers, where quantum nature is not necessarily restricted to the microphysics domain but is also present in other layers of reality characterized by contextuality and potentiality, including but not limited to cognitive sciences, concept theory, linguistics, biology, culture, decision theory and economics.” I know almost nothing about quantum anything, but I recognize the role of human-centered context in each of these fields of study AND in almost every interaction I have. I’ve starting raising it to the attention and RESPONSIBILITY of all the participants–anytime there is opportunity for getting sideways with one another or when it actually happens unexpectedly.
I just had a thought – inspired by all of your comments…. What would it be like to have a card set that named different contexts – history, physiology/wellness, dialogue agreements, physical setting, economic status, leadership dynamics, guiding narratives, purpose, educational levels, physical safety, etc. etc. etc.. There could be 50-200 cards in the deck. They could be used by people working on this pattern (explicitly or implicitly) and with groups in which the cards were passed out and the question asked “Who has a context card in their hand that they think we should really become more aware of and pay more attention to in this situation?” and then discuss any that surface in that inquiry. I’m not about to create that deck, but I’d be happy to participate in the conversations that would lead to its establishment, if anyone wants to take the initiative….
I was attracted by this pattern because this card give me the strength to ask more about the context in discussions. When I started to learn more about the way of communication, I started to ask about the context. However, a few people thought that I am a little bit mean asking all this detailed questions until I knew where they are referring to. This pattern helps me to express myself in a better way. Thank you Tom.
I’m glad this pattern served you, Hildegard. Yet we might remember that context is infinite, multi-dimensional and relative. So perhaps we need to be patient and compassionate for people who don’t have the perspective or commitment to dig sufficiently into it in a given situation (as with the Expanding Situational Curiosity pattern). Perhaps we can help them see how particular pieces of context or contextual information are important to what we/they are doing, thus helping prepare the ground for planting seeds of wise democracy. As people become more aware of this pattern, they/we will design initiatives, processes and systems that make it more easy, natural and expected to delve into contexts.
This strikes me as one of the patterns that I (and possibly we, collectively) could use additional specific skill-building around: what do we need to pay attention to, specifically, in order to become more context aware? How do we make sure we’re not just paying attention to what we’re conditioned to pay attention to? What do we look and listen for? Are there ways we could name the multiple dimensions of context that might be helpful (and work within groups at the start of a project, for example, to make some collective sense around each dimension)? How can we practice this, and “check” how what we observe and sense aligns, or not, with the experience of others? How do we “sense” into context beyond the things we can hear and see clearly…into the field more broadly? (note: several of my questions are addressed and expanded upon in the video for this pattern, thanks for that!)
Thanks for naming this area of inquiry, Jenny. Context is, in fact, infinite. What we focus on is small, whereas context is always gigantic and extremely multi-dimensional. As in many other things, we face the challenge of discerning RELEVANCE – while knowing all the time that whatever we think is (ir)relevant is intrinsically relative thanks to our limited perspective (see the Expanding Situational Curiosity pattern https://www.wd-pl.com/29-expanding-situational-curiosity-v2/). So this is one more non-absolute guidance, but more a reminder that we need to attend to context (as an active factor in any situation) rather than getting stuck in any small-thinking, small-seeing, small-feeling perspective. And within that guidance there is infinite space to learn (as you note) and to become ever more humble. The Resources and Examples on this pattern’s page are a juicy place to begin…